Liebeck’s case also demonstrated the importance of advertising with Black-owned media, as her lawsuit would have failed without their assistance. Liebeck won a high-dollar amount of damages in a lawsuit against McDonald’s in 1992. McDonald’s will face stiff competition from Allen, who has accused the fast food chain of refusing to advertise on his networks. McDonald’s is being sued by media mogul Byron Allen for $10 billion because he claims the company does not advertise with Black-owned media. The lawsuit claimed that the restaurant failed to properly supervise the employee, who had a history of sexual misconduct. In 2018, McDonald’s was sued for $26 million by the parents of a teenage girl who was allegedly raped by an employee at one of the chain’s restaurants in Chicago. McDonald was found to have committed a heinous act, as evidenced by the jury’s awarding Liebeck $700,000 in compensatory damages, which was reduced to $160,000 due to the jury’s finding that she was 20 percent at fault. McDonald’s, on the other hand, refused to settle. Because they can help people get rich or elected, this is a common reason for stories like this to be told. There are some facts in this case that appear insane, but they have nothing to do with how it happened. McDonald’s was ordered to pay a $3 million dollar lawsuit by an 81-year-old woman after she claimed that her coffee was too hot. The contract rider for Van Halen’s 1994 song “ Brown Sugar” warns that it contains no brown sugar. Here’s a closer look at the famous McDonald’s coffee case, including how much Liebeck was actually paid. In fact, her total award was less than $600,000. While Liebeck did receive a large sum of money, it was not nearly as much as many people think. But how much did she actually get? The answer may surprise you. The case was widely publicized, and many people assumed that Liebeck won a huge settlement. They reduced her compensatory damages award by $40,000 to reflect that finding.In the 1990s, a woman named Stella Liebeck was burned by McDonald’s coffee and sued the company. While the jurors had awarded damages to Liebeck, they had found her to be partially responsible for the accident. Coffee brewed at home is generally 135 to 140 degrees. The lawsuit contended Liebeck’s coffee was 165 to 170 degrees when it spilled. Testimony at trial indicated McDonald’s coffee is standardized at 180 to 190 degrees. Morgan argued that McDonald’s was returning to the court as a ″big industry saying, ’Leave us alone, ignore what this jury. Hall also argued the plaintiffs had not been able to establish what would be a safe temperature for coffee. He said ordinary people appreciate that coffee ordered from a restaurant is hot and that if it is mishandled it can burn someone. Hall argued at today’s hearing that the plaintiffs did not prove that hot coffee is a defective product, and were therefore not entitled to damages. Liebeck, who was in court today, declined to comment. Liebeck’s attorney, Reed Morgan, said he was surprised by the ruling, but had no other comment except to say he would appeal the reduction in damages. McDonald’s attorney Bruce Hall said he would appeal today’s ruling, saying the jury’s verdict was unjust. He said $480,000 was appropriate for the ″willful, wanton, reckless and what the court finds was callous″ behavior on the part of McDonald’s. The judge said he arrived at $480,000 figure for punitive damages by tripling the $160,000 compensatory award given Liebeck. Scott noted he had told jurors that any punitive damages must be ″reasonably related to the injury.″ Compensatory damages cover a person’s actual losses, while punitive damages are meant to punish and deter wrongdoing. Scott let stand the compensatory damages but cut the $2.7 million punitive award to $480,000. 27, 1992, when she placed a cup of coffee between her legs to steady it while prying the lid off at a McDonald’s driveup window. She suffered third-degree burns on her legs, groin and buttocks in Feb. Last month, a jury awarded nearly $2.9 million in punitive and compensatory damages to Stella Liebeck, 81. for an elderly woman who was scalded by hot coffee she spilled on her lap.Īt the same time, State District Judge Robert Scott denied a motion by attorneys for McDonald’s asking him to grant a new trial or, at least, throw out the punitive damages altogether. (AP) _ A judge today sharply reduced a $2.7 million punitive damage award against McDonald’s Corp.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |